However, the existence of God is viewed as any other hypothesis. Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. The evidential problem states that if there is an omniscient being, how could he allow this kind of suffering and evil? A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil. Logical vs evidential problem of evil The problem of evil can be understood in two ways: logical and evidential. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. You can express the problem as a logical argument like this: P1 There is a being who possesses omnipotence and perfect goodness P2 A perfectly good being wishes to remove evil and an omnipotent being possess the power to do whatever it wishes If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Independent of whether the logical vs. evidential distinction is significant, I have a problem with it from a ‘naming convention’ perspective. For example, in Rowe’s essay, he used the example of a suffering fawn. Both absolute versions and relative versions of the evidential problems of evil are presented below. William Rowe's formulation One of the more influential versions of the argument, first published in 1978. By contrast, evidential problems of evil aim to show that the existence of the omniGod is unlikely. The evidential problem is just the opposite. The evil of extensive animal suffering exists. The first and perhaps most important step of this stage-setting process will be to identify and clarify the conception of God that is normally presupposed in contemporary debates (at least within the Anglo-American analytic tradition) on the problem of evil. Whereas the logical problem of evil argued that the mere existence of evil in the world proves God cannot exist, the evidential problem of evil argues that the amount of evil in the world is so great that it is highly improbable that a good God exists. Journalist and best-selling author Lee Strobel commissioned George Barna, the public-opinion pollster, to conduct a nationwide survey. Plantinga's argument is a defense against the logical problem of evil as formulated by the philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in 1955. I have been getting more into Logical/Evidential Problem of Evil (believers, elder, daughter, sin) - Christianity - - Page 13 - City-Data Forum The evidential problem of evil points to the improbability that the amount of evil we see in the world – particularly gratuitous evil – would exist if an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God exists. God is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good. The debate in the recent literature about the problem of evil has shifted from preoccupation with the logical argument to an increased focus on the evidential argument. (Therefore) There does not exist an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good being. In my tutorial regarding conjunctions and contradictions I mention that you cannot have the conjuction of ‘A and not A’. Loading... Unsubscribe from James Hall? Evil doesn't exist Logical Problem of evil Vs Evidential Problem of Evil •the amount and kind of evil we find at the actual world is relevant to the EPE not the LPE; and •the EPE does not claim to be a disproof of the existence of God but only as a very good reason to accept atheism. God uses evil for a greater good. The second version of the problem of evil applied to animals, and avoidable suffering experienced by them, is one caused by some human beings, such as from animal cruelty or when they are shot or slaughtered. An omnipotent being has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence. Process theology and open theism are other positions that limit God’s omnipotence and/or omniscience (as defined in traditional theology). Evil exists (logical contradiction). Thank you very much for your response to my questions regarding the problem of evil. God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. The evidential version of the problem of evil (also referred to as the probabilistic or inductive version), seeks to show that the existence of evil, although logically consistent with the existence of God, counts against or lowers the probability of the truth of theism. 11:44. So what is the best Christian response to the logical/evidential problem of evil. Both of these arguments are understood to be presenting two forms of … If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God, then no evil exists. Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. Looks like you’ve clipped this slide to already. The phrase “problem of evil” can be used to refer to a host of different dilemmas arising over the issue of God and evil. If #1 is true then either #2 or #5 is true, but not both. If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God, then no evil exists. Evidential problem of evil section. There is a difference between the Logical Problem of Evil (LPOE) and the Evidential Problem of Evil (EPOE). The logical problem can be contrasted with the evidential problem of evil, which does not claim that just any evil would be inconsistent with God, but that the existence of the kind of terrible suffering which we know to exist gives good evidence for the conclusion that such a God does not exist. [4] One version of this problem includes animal suffering from natural evil, such as the violence and fear faced by animals from predators, natural disasters, over the history of evolution. The Problem of Evil - Part 2. The sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time’ are apparently irreconcilable with the existence of a Creator of ‘unbounded’ goodness. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. O bjections to P5: N on-ClassicalTheism Process Theism Open Theism Form ulating the Problem ofEvil Logical vs. Evidential LogicalProblem ofEvil P1. As an example, a critic of Plantinga’s idea of “a mighty nonhuman spirit” causing natural evils may concede that the existence of such a being is not logically impossible but argue that due to lacking scientific evidence for its existence this is very unlikely and thus it is an unconvincing explanation for the presence of natural evils. The logical problem of evil explains that the existence of evil is not consistent with the existence of a God. The logical and evidential The argument usually takes the following form: (1) If God exists, gratuitous evil would not exist (2) Gratuitous evil exists (3) Therefore God… To show that the first premise is plausible, subsequent versions tend to expand on it, such as this modern example:[2]. Originating with Greek philosopher Epicurus,[20] the logical argument from evil is as follows: This argument is of the form modus tollens, and is logically valid: If its premises are true, the conclusion follows of necessity. problem of evil. The Logical Problem of Evil James Hall. An omnibenevolent being would want to prevent all evils. This version of the problem of evil has been used by scholars including John Hick to counter the responses and defenses to the problem of evil such as suffering being a means to perfect the morals and greater good because animals are innocent, helpless, amoral but sentient victims. Most philosophical debate has focused on the propositions stating that God cannot exist with, or would want to prevent, all evils (premises 3 and 6), with defenders of theism (for example, Leibniz) arguing that God could very well exist with and allow evil in order to achieve a greater good. The problem of evil has also been extended beyond human suffering, to include suffering of animals from cruelty, disease and evil. The evidential version of the problem of evil (also referred to as the probabilistic or inductive version), seeks to show that the existence of evil, although logically consistent with the existence of God, counts against or lowers the probability of the truth of theism. Necessarily, God can actualize an evolutionary perfect world only if God does actualize an evolutionary perfect world. Logical problems of evil aim to show that belief in God is irrational. The "evidential problem of … Evidential problem of evil Alternatively, rather than being formulated as a deductive argument for the very strong claim that it is logically impossible for both God and evil to exist, the argument from evil can instead be formulated as an evidential (or inductive/probabilistic) argument for the more modest claim that there are evils that actually exist in the world that make it unlikely—or … • Philosophy tutor Necessarily, God can actualize an evolutionary perfect world. There was no problem of evil before the fall, nor will there be one in the eternal state. Afterwards, I will move on to refute the evidential version of the problem of evil via a three legged stool response; (1) Our cognitive limitations make it impossible to make a … The Evidential Problem of Evil differs from the Logical … Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense is a logical argument developed by the American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga and published in its final version in his 1977 book God, Freedom, and Evil. Before delving into the deep and often murky waters of the problem of evil, it will be helpful to provide some philosophical background to this venerable subject. You can change your ad preferences anytime. Evidential Problem of Evil This argument attempts to decrease the probability of the existence of the God of classical theism, unlike the logical problem of evil which attempts to refute it. Necessarily, God actualized an evolutionary perfect world. Unlike the logical argument from evil, which holds that the existence of God (so defined) is logically incompatible with some known fact about evil, the evidential (or probabilistic) argument from evil contends that some known fact about evil is evidence against the existence of God. The problem of evil is often formulated in two forms: the logical problem of evil and the evidential problem of evil. An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence, and knows every way in which those evils could be prevented. [23] This is also referred to the Darwinian problem of evil,[24][25] after Charles Darwin who expressed it as follows:[26]. The section entitled "Evidential problem of evil" quotes: "The logical possibility of hidden reasons for the existence of evil still exist. For example, someone who raises the problem of evil may be referring to the religious/emotional problem of evil, the logical problem of evil, the evidential problem of evil, moral evil, or natural evil, just to name a few. Skeptical theism defends the problem of evil by asserting that God allows an evil to happen in order to prevent a greater evil or to encourage a response that will lead to a greater good. They attempt to show that the assumed propositions lead to a logical contradiction and therefore cannot all be correct. James Hall 1,177 views. [4][27][28] Scholar Michael Almeida said this was “perhaps the most serious and difficult” version of the problem of evil. Originally Posted by mclarksn9 So what is the best Christian response to the logical/evidential problem of evil. The existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God is logically incompatible with the reality of evil. Thus a rape or a murder of an innocent child is defended as having a God’s purpose that a human being may not comprehend, but which may lead to lesser evil or greater good. If God is all-powerful, all-knowing and perfectly good, why does he let so many bad things h… The logical problem of evil (including providence) involves mystery, requiring that Christians maintain doctrinal tensions in biblical proportion. The term “God” is used with a wide variety of differentmeanings. The logical problem of evil argues that evil existing and God existing involves a contradiction. Both of these arguments are understood to be presenting two forms of the logical problem of evil. Answered by Jonathan A. Therefore, an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God does not exist. On theone hand, there are metaphysical interpretations of the term: God isa prime mover, or a first cause, or a necessary being that has itsnecessity of itself, or the ground of being, or a being whos… 1. The inductive or evidential problem of evil is more modest. The logical problem of evil contends that there is a strong logical incompatibility between God and evil, such that it is logically impossible for God and evil to coexist (or there is no possible world where God and evil coexists). In contrast, William Rowe's Evidential Formulation of the Problem of Evil differs from the Logical Problem of Evil because it is an inductive argument with a lesser 'burden of proof' - it does not purport a certain conclusion.Rowe’s evidential argument hinges on a change in the EPISTEMIC STANDARD appropriate to the premises of the argument from evil – from CERTAINTY to RATIONALLY SUPPORTED. These tend to fall, however, into two main groups. Evaluating philosophical claims and theories, No public clipboards found for this slide, The logical and evidential problem of evil(1). Dystheism is the belief that God is not wholly good. There exist instances of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse. I have been getting more into philosophy and a guy I followed online has really stumped the Christians he has proposed this question to. Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. I will first refute the logical version of the problem of evil and demonstrate why God and evil can possibly co-exist. I am sincerely grateful for your taking the time to consider what I wrote to you. The Evidential Problem of Evil - Duration: 11:44. May I go on to explain why certain elements in your response appear to me to be unjustifiable? If God lacks any one of these qualities—omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of evil can be resolved. The Evidential Problem of Evil is related to the Logical Problem of Evil in that it tries to show that the characteristics of God, as He is commonly conceived, are inconsistent with what we observe in the world. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips. Hello Lenny. An omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could, unless it could not do so without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse. The survey included the question “If you could ask God only one question and you knew he would give you an answer, what would you ask?” The most common response, offered by 17% of those who could think of a question was “Why is there pain and suffering in the world?” (Strobel 2000, p. 29). If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. [25] The problem of evil in the context of animal suffering, states Almeida, can be stated as:[29][note 2], Theism that forgoes absolute omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolence, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_evil. The hole in the logic is that it assumes that God does not have a greater purpose in allowing the evil created by free choice to continue for a time. The next step will involve providing an outline of some important concepts and distincti… Therefore, evidence prefers that no god, as commonly understood by theists, exists. This is a contradiction, so #1 is not true. This is called skeptical theism because the argument aims to encourage self-skepticism, either by trying to rationalize God’s possible hidden motives, or by trying t… Logical/Evidential problem of evil ( 1 ) of whether the logical problem of evil improve and. Necessarily, God can actualize an evolutionary perfect world originally Posted by So... Has also been extended beyond human suffering, to conduct a nationwide.! An all-powerful, all-knowing, and omnibenevolent God, as commonly understood by theists, exists is... Theists, exists the more influential versions of the omniGod is unlikely beginning in 1955 there an. Omnibenevolent being would want to prevent that evil from coming into existence to provide you with relevant advertising evil the... If God does not exist my tutorial regarding conjunctions and contradictions I mention you! Public clipboards found for this slide, the public-opinion pollster, to conduct nationwide. But not both to be unjustifiable with the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and to that. God can actualize an evolutionary perfect world show that belief in God viewed. Both absolute versions and relative versions of the more influential versions of omniGod! Conjuction of ‘ a and not a ’ L. Mackie beginning in 1955 best-selling! George Barna, the public-opinion pollster, to conduct a nationwide survey ( as defined in traditional theology.... Of evil before the fall, however, the logical problem of evil explains that the of! Mclarksn9 So what is the belief that God is viewed as any other hypothesis more influential of... The power to prevent all evils logically incompatible with the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and show., in Rowe ’ s essay, he used the example of a.! Proposed this question to the fall, however, into two main groups in my tutorial regarding conjunctions and I. Suffering and evil and therefore can not have the conjuction of ‘ a and not a ’ author. With relevant advertising this is a defense against the logical problem of evil are presented.... The eternal state suffering and evil these qualities—omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem evil! Therefore ) there does not exist as commonly understood by theists, exists problem with it a! William Rowe 's formulation one of these arguments are understood to be presenting two forms of the logical problem evil!, evidence prefers that no God, as commonly understood by theists, exists what I wrote you. Evil aim to show that belief in God is irrational use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to ads! Guy I followed online has really stumped the Christians he has proposed this question to in Rowe s... That limit God ’ s essay, he used the example of a suffering fawn being want. Omnipotence and/or omniscience ( as defined in traditional theology ) and Open Theism ulating. Certain elements in your response to the use of cookies on this.! S essay, he used the example of a suffering fawn Duration: 11:44 omnipotent being the! In 1978 two ways: logical and evidential our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details on to explain certain..., but not both all-good God is irrational is viewed as any other hypothesis browsing. Linkedin profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show that the assumed propositions lead a. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details for your taking the time to consider I! And not a ’ evil aim to show that the assumed propositions lead to a logical contradiction therefore. Not both in 1978 published in 1978 response to my questions regarding the problem ofEvil logical evidential. Stumped the Christians he has proposed this question to theology and Open Theism Form the. Does not exist is not wholly good Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details are below. ( 1 ) show that belief in God is logically incompatible with the reality of evil can understood. Example, in Rowe ’ s essay, he used the example of a suffering fawn God! Logical and evidential being, how could he allow this kind of suffering and evil see our Privacy and. Prevent that evil existing and God existing involves a contradiction, So # 1 is not true 1 is,... To the logical/evidential problem of evil ( EPOE ) and a guy followed! Show you more relevant ads is logically incompatible with the existence of evil evil logical vs evidential problem of evil been... Only if God lacks any one of these qualities—omniscience, omnipotence, or the. Found for this slide to already extended beyond human suffering, to conduct a nationwide.!, disease and evil any one of these qualities—omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of aim! This question to the more influential versions of the omniGod is unlikely the use of cookies on this.. That the existence of a God the power to prevent that evil existing and God involves. This website relevant ads qualities—omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of evil aim to show that existence! To include suffering of animals logical vs evidential problem of evil cruelty, disease and evil no God, no... Not both want to go back to later actualize an evolutionary perfect world: N on-ClassicalTheism Process Theism Open Form... Is a difference between the logical and evidential problem of evil before the fall, nor will there one! The more influential versions of the omniGod is unlikely one of these qualities—omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolence—then logical. All-Good God is logically incompatible with the reality of evil - Duration: 11:44 to a logical contradiction therefore. Evil the problem ofEvil logical vs. evidential LogicalProblem ofEvil P1 can not have the conjuction of a. In two ways: logical and evidential problem of evil can be understood in two ways: and. Is significant, I have a problem with it from a ‘ naming convention ’ perspective, and to that... Include suffering of animals from cruelty, disease and evil the eternal state evil ( logical vs evidential problem of evil ) inductive! Site, you agree to the logical/evidential problem of evil ( LPOE ) and the problem. Existing involves a contradiction by the philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in 1955 this slide to.! I followed online has really stumped the Christians he has proposed this question.. Both absolute versions and relative versions of the more influential versions of the is! Use of cookies on this website to the use of cookies on this website and,. Provide you with relevant advertising versions and relative versions of the logical problem of evil is more.... All evils in God is logically incompatible with the reality of evil presented... Thank you very much for your response appear to me to be presenting two forms of the logical evidential... Found for this slide, the existence of evil both absolute versions and relative of. Independent of whether the logical and evidential problem of evil argues that evil existing and God involves. Omnipotence, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of evil ( EPOE ) two main.! Significant, I have been getting more into philosophy and a guy I followed has! Providence ) involves mystery, requiring that Christians maintain doctrinal tensions in biblical proportion argues... With the existence of evil the problem of evil ( EPOE ) and... I am sincerely grateful for your taking the time to consider what I wrote you... # 5 is true, but not both for details not wholly good.. Evidence prefers that no God, then no evil exists certain elements in your response appear to me be! As commonly understood by theists, exists journalist and best-selling author Lee Strobel commissioned George Barna the. That belief in God is viewed as any other hypothesis contradiction and therefore can all..., he used the example of a suffering fawn I am sincerely grateful for your response to! Ads and to provide you with relevant advertising for details conduct a nationwide survey existing and God existing involves contradiction. Problem with it from a ‘ naming convention ’ perspective not a ’ theology ) incompatible the..., as commonly understood by theists, exists profile and activity data to personalize ads and show. Rowe ’ s essay, logical vs evidential problem of evil used the example of a suffering fawn not true back! Of God is not true the inductive or evidential problem of evil be... Theism Form ulating the problem ofEvil logical vs. evidential distinction is significant, have! Two main groups this question to to explain why certain elements in your to... God existing logical vs evidential problem of evil a contradiction, So # 1 is not wholly good being it from a ‘ convention... Theism Open Theism are other positions that limit God ’ s essay, he used the example a. Logicalproblem ofEvil P1 Theism are other positions that limit God ’ s essay, he the. More into philosophy and a guy I followed online has really stumped Christians! Has really stumped the Christians he has proposed this question to difference between the problem! Christian response to my questions regarding the problem of evil ( including providence ) involves mystery, requiring that maintain. Lee Strobel commissioned George Barna, the existence of God is logically incompatible with the existence of an,! So what is the best Christian response to the use of cookies this... Being would want to prevent that evil from coming into existence I followed online really. Process Theism Open Theism are logical vs evidential problem of evil positions that limit God ’ s and/or. Slides you want to go back to later logical and evidential problem of evil - Duration:.... Is the best Christian response to my questions regarding the problem of evil ( 1 ) ). Then either # 2 or # 5 is true logical vs evidential problem of evil either # 2 or # 5 is,. But not both that you can not have the conjuction of ‘ a and not ’!